Long back in 2005 when I was newly introduced to a very
popular social media “orkut”, I proudly showed off my profile with my own
picture which was clicked during a
family wedding. Internet communication technology was new to India and we women
were regularly being targeted because of the easy availability of our presence.
This was largely due to lack of security in the social media as well as
internet. We did not have two step verification for Gmail; Yahoo chat
messenger, which was extremely popular during those days, almost made everyone’s
personal information that were uploaded for the website, available to anyone
who wanted access the user. It was during that period that I learnt about cloning
of profiles which were made to harass individuals, especially women. The
profiles may not be hacked, may neither be directly accessed by way of sending
friends’ request; but the profile pictures may be downloaded and a new profile
may be created with the available profile picture and profile information. Way
back in 2006-7 I already had several women victims who contacted me for help
and guidance. Almost all of them had common problem : harassment by way of
creation of fake avatars. I have been part of the feminist movement which vehemently
protested making women as ‘sex object’ on internet. Indeed women are made as ‘sex
objects’ and they are regularly targeted by misogynists, perverts and online traffickers
who may selectively pick up women and girls by seeing their profiles, profile
pictures and shadowing their online activities.
Let me go back to my own experiences where I received the
first harassing comment (which was not stalking, neither resulted due to hacking)
which was plainly nothing but ‘bullying’. My first profile picture in Orkut
received a remark which mocked at my supposedly ‘over made-up face’
and ‘blood red lipstick’. I knew this was just the beginning and if
reciprocated, the bully may be extremely provoked to reply back. But this was
not the first and last incident. I have received various negative comments, I
have had my own period of being victim of a female stalker who monitored me and
did send defamatory mails about me to my husband and again I had noticed
several attempts to open Facebook accounts with my name and email ids. The
later was detected and prevented by me because I never neglect the security messages
sent by websites in my mails.
In my research I have seen that often the police and lawyers
refuse to help the women victims and start the blame game. This is because they
may not be aware of the mechanism to help and counsel the victims. In my
opinion, websites must also be made responsible for third party victimization of
women especially when the genuine reports of violation fail to move the
websites. However, the websites concerned, may
constantly develop safety policy guidelines for users to make the users take self
prevention mechanisms. I have been part of Facebook women safety program for
quite some times now. I continue to demand
for more liability on the part of the websites especially for women and this
time my concern was safety of profile pictures of women. I was extremely happy to see the developments
in the security and policies of Facebook which was introduced in India on 22nd
June, 2017: ‘The profile picture guard’. Every woman must avail this
opportunity to safeguard their profile picture since this is the most chosen
target of all the images that may be uploaded by a user. The step by step guide
to how to use this ‘guard’ is explained by Facebook team @ https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/06/giving-people-more-control-over-their-facebook-profile-picture/
However, I understand that it is not the women only, but
children are also extremely vulnerable targets of sexual predators. Men are
neither excluded. All users must use this facility and it may definitely help
to reduce ‘image stealing’ for various malicious purposes including morphing,
hacking and creation of fake avatars. But we need to understand that is not the
ultimate answer to prevent revenge porn cases. While image of an individual may
be saved because Facebook may detect the particular stolen image easily after
receiving the report, there is a still remains a lacuna for other photographs which
are in the personal albums. We must also note that the website will not suomotu
take action for the cloned or stolen images. The victim must report the profile
and the concerned profile picture along with the “shielded picture” as evidence.
Its nonetheless a big step in the history of cyber security for
women and I congratulate Facebook for taking this initiative. But again, ………
accidents do happen and we need to be stronger to recover.
Please Note: Do not violate copyright of this blog. If you would like to use informations provided in this blog for your own assignment/writeup/project/blog/article, please cite it as “Halder D. (2017), "The Facebook way of saving “face” : The profile picture guard by Facebook” 23rd June, 2017, published in http://debaraticyberspace.blogspot.com
Please Note: Do not violate copyright of this blog. If you would like to use informations provided in this blog for your own assignment/writeup/project/blog/article, please cite it as “Halder D. (2017), "The Facebook way of saving “face” : The profile picture guard by Facebook” 23rd June, 2017, published in http://debaraticyberspace.blogspot.com